Here is a solutions link for HW 4. Please feel free to comment.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_GIlXrjJVn4eGRGLWNJR1g3TXc/edit?usp=sharing
I was thinking that, now that we have the motivation of wanting to understand a p-n junction, maybe we should back up a little and review the different kinds of current (drift and diffusion). How does that sound? Also, perhaps you would like to read about the two kinds of current:
1) drift current (current directly associated with the force that an Electric field exerts on an electron.
2) diffusion current (current associated with a density gradient!).
Also, you can read about the continuity equation for electrons in a semiconductor, and the recombination time. I think that is related to the life-time of an excited electron (and there is one for holes as well). Here is a guiding question for that: suppose you excited some electrons into the conduction band (with photons) and thus created a state not in (thermal) equilibrium. What would happen over time after that? What mathematical description might be suitable to describe the return to equilibrium? What would the characteristic time scale be? What is it called?
For the following problems let's use: \( D_2 = 0.6 \times 10^{22} \, states/(eV-cm^3)\) and \( D_3 = 0.3 \times 10^{22} \, states/(eV-cm^3)\). (Or would you rather do them with D2 and D3 equal? comment here if you have an opinion on that. (simplicity vs generality))
Warm-up problems related to \mu.
1. Calculate the intrinsic carrier concentrations (\(n_i\) and \(p_i\)) for a semiconductor:
a) with a gap of 1 eV at room temperature.
b) with a gap of 0.25 eV at room temperature.
c) with a gap of 0.25 eV at 60 Kelvin.
2. For a semi-conductor with a 1.0 eV gap, let's set our zero of energy at the top of the valence band and calcuate:
a) n and p for \(\mu = 0.7 \, eV\)
b) n and p for \(\mu = 0.8 \, eV\)
c) n and p for \(\mu = 0.9 \, eV\)
d) how does the product np depend on \(\mu\)?
Doping:
3. Doping with donors adds electrons to a semiconductor. Why do we assume that they all go into the conduction band? Don't some of them end up filling holes (empty states) in the valence band? Discuss. Why do people usually ignore that? Why (when) would that be okay or not okay?
4. Here is a bigger doping problem. Imagine doping an Si crystal with some P (phosphorus) to a level of \(N_d\) (number of donors). That means there are \(N_d\) extra electrons on the crystal, right? But I have heard that there are also \(N_d\) local trap states (bound states localized in the vicinity of each P atom due to its net + charge). Why don't the electrons just go into those (shallow) trap states instead of into the conduction band? (Let's suppose those bound states have an energy about 10 or 15 meV below the conduction band edge.) Would your opinion be different if those states were 200 meV below the band edge?
Transport:
5. A semiconductor is doped to a level of \(5 \times 10^{17}\, cm^{-3}\). It has a transport scattering time of \(\tau = 10^{-14}\, seconds\) and an effective mass of 0.2. Suppose its shape is a rectangle 1 mm x 1 mm x 1 cm.
a) How much current flow would there be if you applied 0.05 Volts along its long direction?
b) What is the current density?
c) What is the electric field in the semiconductor?
6. a) Calculate the conduction band (electron) diffusion current in a semiconductor with a 1x1 mm cross-section where \(D_n = 100 \, cm^2/sec\) and \(n(x) = 10^{17} e^{-x/L}\,cm^{-3}\) from x = 0 to 20 L.
b) Plot this current as a function of x.
(This problem is mostly a math exercise and won't really make intuitive sense because the current depends on x.)
c) What is the current density (as a function of x)?
Electrons out of equilibrium:
7. Consider a p-doped semiconductor (e.g., Boron doped Si) with \( D_2 = 0.6 \times 10^{22} \, states/(eV-cm^3)\) and \( D_3 = 0.3 \times 10^{22} \, states/(eV-cm^3)\) doped at a level of \(10^{17}\, cm^{-3}\) holes in the valence band.
a) What is the concentration of electrons in the conduction band, n, for this hole-doped material?
b) Does it depend on the energy gap? If so, use 1 eV.
c) Suppose that at t =0 a flash of light is used to excite carriers into the conduction band. Suppose n increases to 100 times what you got in part a). What is your guess as to what will happen after that (regarding the time dependence of n).
d) Use the equation \(\frac {dn(t)}{dt} = -(n(t) - n_{eq})/\tau_r \) to solve for n(t) after t = 0. Here \(\tau_r\) is called the recombination time. It is completely different from the transport scattering time in problem 5.
e) To what sort of event does \(\tau_r\) refer?
8. Study the equation: \(\frac{\partial n(x,t)}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial J_n(x,t)}{\partial x} - (n(x,t) - n_{eq})/\tau_r \). This is a very important equation.
a) Describe what each term in this equation means. Explain this equation in words.
b) Suppose a laser pulse is used to excite carriers, as in the previous problem, but instead of a uniform excitation the same everywhere in the semiconductor, suppose there is a spatially somewhat localzed excitation. Describe the time dependence of n(x,t). Related your description to this equation.
Hi, when is this assignment due?
ReplyDeletegood point. Friday, 5 PM.
DeleteI assume problem 2 is also at room temperature?
ReplyDelete^^
Deletegood, yes.
Deletefor 2 do we assume KT = .0255 and for 5 did you mean to write electrons/cm3?
ReplyDeletealso for 5, what do you mean rectangle? lol
DeleteI would use .025 eV, and yes, assume room temperature unless it says not to.
Deleteyes.
DeleteWhat is the product np? Is this product of n and p?
ReplyDeleteyes
DeleteThe chemical potential (mu) does not alter the product of N and P.
DeleteDoes anyone else conclude the same thing?
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteYeah, I got the same. I don't have my work with my currently but they were all about 5*10^22 I think. Either that or 10^24
DeleteI'm trying to think about question 3 and whether or not electrons fill up holes? I want to say yes but I'm guessing that they would be the electrons that lose energy. I know that in an intrinsic semiconductor n=p but do some electrons also fill holes in the intrinsic semiconductor. If the electrons do fill some of the holes then it should be the same for this extrinsic n-type semiconductor. Anybody have any thoughts.
ReplyDeleteI was thinking that the probability of a dopant electron occupying one of the holes would be proportional to the number of holes in the band. So the Vb has like 10^5 vs the Cb with about 10^17, so it would seem somewhere around 10^12 times more likely for an electron to go into the Cb. I'm pretty sure there's more than that but that was my initial thought on it
DeleteI can see that. The question asks "why do we assume they all go into the conduction band?". I am still having trouble figuring out how the holes and electrons interact. When the recombine and what dictates their recombination?
DeleteThis problem is not really worded so well. Maybe the thing to ask is what about the electrons in the CB before it is doped. Why don't they count?
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteNumber 6 seems simple enough but why do you give us the piece "x=0 to 20L". I'm thinking about simply inserting the values into the the diffusion current formula. Is this correct?
ReplyDeleteNever mind that. I get it.
Delete"In warmup problem one, do we assume that mu is one half the distance between the two bands? ie...in 1A) mu = 0.5eV?"
ReplyDeleteWell if you assume that, then do you get \(n_i = p_i\)? If not, why not?
Intrinsic implies \(n_i = p_i\). Find the value of mu that makes that true.
short answer: no.
I am very unsure about my answer for number 3! any comments will be greatly appreciated.
ReplyDeleteDoping with donors adds electrons to a semiconductor. Why do we assume that they all go into the conduction band?
- I am thinking the donors atoms have there electrons in in higher orbitals that are unfilled. Then these electrons are able to move across to other atoms and allow for a movement of electrons.
Don't some of them end up filling holes (empty states) in the valence band?
-The donors only contribute to electrons. If the electrons move into "holes" wont the formal charge of the atom be changed to a positive value? Therefore the atom will "not allow" this to happen (electrostatic potential).
- I am assuming doping with non donating atoms will contribute holes to the system. This will lead to some electrons in the system fill the holes???
What does everyone else think about this problem?
Why do people usually ignore that? Why (when) would that be okay or not okay?
(I do not know why???) is it because doping the material with atoms only allows for small number of electrons to fill a negligible amount of holes???
These are great questions! I look forward to seeing the dialogue on this.
DeleteMy understanding is as follows, before the dopant atoms are added there are a number of electrons that are thermally excited into the conduction band due to the fermi function. These electrons are moving back and fourth between both bands but the total number of electrons in the conduction band remains roughly around a constant value.
DeleteOne you add the dopant atoms you in essence increase the value of mu and therefor shift the equilibrium for those thermally excited electrons.
There are still electrons moving from the conduction band to the valance band and vice verse but the equilibrium value for the average number of electrons found in the conduction band is much greater due to the doping.
Let me know if my understanding is wrong here, it very well may be
You can generally ignore the electrons that are moving from the conduction band to the valance band, and the valance band to the conduction band because the total number of electrons in each band remains roughly constant
DeleteWhat is the difference between Current density and Diffusion current?
ReplyDeletedepends on context. maybe nothing. (what's the context?)
DeleteThat's interesting. The context is question number 6. I'm wondering what the relationship between the two is in the problem.
Deleteno difference as far as I can see. i think they both refer to diffusion current density.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteOk. I read through Streetman an they way that current density is defined is the sum of the drift and and diffusion currents. Maybe you mentioned it in class and I missed it. So i'm thinking the reason that there is no difference between the two in this particular case is that the drift is negligible.
DeleteYes, that makes sense to me. In this problem, what is the electric field?
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteIt's not given. I don't think we can figure it out with the information given. If we are to use the same potential difference that we used in problem 5 then we would have .05 eV/cm.
Deleteit is zero.
Delete